Print

[RoGH]

I find it promising, there are some things which i don't like, e.g. auto stats awarding or whole concept of BN 2.0, but in general im satisfied and looking forward to May 15th

[B4ST4RD]

d3 beta

transition from d2 to d3 = awesome
game play = awesome
characters = awesome
switching skills = awesome
graphics = awesome
info popups = awesome
feeling powerful = awesome
blacksmith = awesome but lvl reqs -.-

auto-stats = okay

content = a little bit small
b.net 2.0 = fail
items you can find = fail

[AsaroV]

d3 beta

transition from d2 to d3 = awesome
game play = awesome
characters = awesome
switching skills = awesome
graphics = awesome
info popups = awesome
feeling powerful = awesome
blacksmith = awesome but lvl reqs -.-

auto-stats = okay

content = a little bit small
b.net 2.0 = fail
items you can find = fail

agree ^^

[FeN]

yeah, i had chance to use bn 2.0 at sc 2 and its such a failure. i dont know why blizzard just didnt improve old one :/

[Mr.Mag]

what's wrong with bn 2.0?

[zales22]

yes agree! ;p chat is fail in first place~~  I hope in full vesrsion we will see it more similar too d2, not f*cked up window-chat like in sc2 ...

[GuN]

Diablo3 feels really addicting, like Diablo2. Of course and thats a good thing, in a different way. Personally i wouldnt buy a new version of Diablo2 and i have to admit, im a bit disappointed about some changes in the beta so far. There were actually cool things in the beta and they changed it back to the "Diablo2" feeling. Well thats a personal preference, but in general the game is really cool.
As you already pointed out, the social part is really really bad. The chat is quite small, you havent any cool features like in wow and the guild/clan section wont be released at 15th may version. BN 2.0 feels like an alpha version even after a year of starcraft2. Very disappointing.

[torgoch]

lack of social support creates good starting point for communities like ours