Print

[torgoch]

what do you think about that?
imo worst is complete lack of hostility in pve games-old good times of PKPK!!~~~ are gone. also a big disappointment is number of players in one game,few years ago i expected sth like 64 O_o and of course the graphics could be a bit darker. theres too much colors on the screen,spell effects,target backlight and colorful locations, i miss the gloom of previous parts

[saesa]

no private games
lack of judgment, lack of properties on items (ie. just gosu ones on items, lack of really exceptional items) - all generic, on inferno items will differ only with +vitality for sure , too far-fetched skills visually from character level 1

[AsaroV]

4 players at pve game :/

no private games
lack of judgment, lack of properties on items (ie. just gosu ones on items, lack of really exceptional items) - all generic, on inferno items will differ only with +vitality for sure , too far-fetched skills visually from character level 1

no privates? Oo

[GuN]

ofc we have private games, but you dont have game names, its a invite-request, friend quick join system

[RoGH]

If i could name only one thing, 4 ppl per game would be it. I was expecting at least the same number as in d2, 10-12 would be fine, perfect match for a common d2 clan.

[GuN]

i really loved those 8ppl games too, but i guess, they changed the number in case of balancing the game.
maybe 4ppl will be chalenging and 8ppl wouldnt ? dunno, just a guess

[saesa]

no private arenas i meant

[Ajantis]

If i could name only one thing, 4 ppl per game would be it. I was expecting at least the same number as in d2, 10-12 would be fine, perfect match for a common d2 clan.

I also thought 4 ppl suck. But as much as I would like to see more ppl in the game, with its current gfx it would really be a serious problem. D3 is just way too eye-candy. Implementing 8 or 12 ppl in the game would make it unplayable.

My major issues with D3:
- no stats (well... there are stats, but in fact they do NOTHING)
- no item requirements (only lv req, but no str req, dex req)
- runes available from the start
- no skill levels
- no differences between chars of the same class (if you make 60 lv barb and I make 60lv barb they will both be EXACTLY the same - no different stats/skills)
- no open PvP
- no replays
- no spectators
- no arena editor

I guess I could enumerate way more, but atm only those came to my mind ;P

[Rufi]

4 ppl games sucks hard

[bud]

4 pep in game, useless whie items (as for now ),no stats , barb cant use bow

[Vik]

Totally agree the 4 ppl ingame limit is one of those things that rly feels stupid to me

[RoGH]

If i could name only one thing, 4 ppl per game would be it. I was expecting at least the same number as in d2, 10-12 would be fine, perfect match for a common d2 clan.

I also thought 4 ppl suck. But as much as I would like to see more ppl in the game, with its current gfx it would really be a serious problem. D3 is just way too eye-candy. Implementing 8 or 12 ppl in the game would make it unplayable.

My major issues with D3:
- no stats (well... there are stats, but in fact they do NOTHING)
- no item requirements (only lv req, but no str req, dex req)
- runes available from the start
- no skill levels
- no differences between chars of the same class (if you make 60 lv barb and I make 60lv barb they will both be EXACTLY the same - no different stats/skills)
- no open PvP
- no replays
- no spectators
- no arena editor

I guess I could enumerate way more, but atm only those came to my mind ;P

Yep, i understand your point Ajan, but that should be blizzard's job to make gfx equivalent to bigger group of players.

[Mr.Mag]

i hope the only one reason why blizz limits game to only 4 players is for technical-security reasons. if diablo3 will be typical terminal-game (like web browser games) where all decisions are taken on server, a lot of data have to be transfered. in this situation no "big cheates" would be available. unfortuntely i dont believe in my point of view ;p

[B4ST4RD]

i hope the only one reason why blizz limits game to only 4 players is for technical-security reasons. if diablo3 will be typical terminal-game (like web browser games) where all decisions are taken on server, a lot of data have to be transfered. in this situation no "big cheates" would be available. unfortuntely i dont believe in my point of view ;p

There were games with 5!! people in beta already. Those "technical-security reasons" don't seem to work all the time.

[Lolet]

IIRC they limited pve multiplayer only because game would be too easy with 4+ ppl

i hope the only one reason why blizz limits game to only 4 players is for technical-security reasons. if diablo3 will be typical terminal-game (like web browser games) where all decisions are taken on server, a lot of data have to be transfered. in this situation no "big cheates" would be available. unfortuntely i dont believe in my point of view ;p

On the contrary - they used some new technology, where the client does most serverside stuff - and as we've seen recently - it's very exploitable (for example d3 beta wp exploit)